What do you think of the girly figures on CDX?

Yeah!
47% (191 votes)
OK once in a while
32% (129 votes)
Nooooooooooo!
21% (87 votes)
Total votes: 407
[categories: ]
JoshB's picture
Submitted by JoshB on 8 June, 2008 - 16:42.

So here's the deal - the Haruhi review brought up some good issues about female figurines, and whether or not we should cover them. What do you think? Should they receive coverage at all? Are they interesting?

Personally, I think variety is good, less we fall into too much of a niche. Our passion is Japanese Toys, and that's a wide spectrum. If you look at the new releases coming out of Japan each month, 80% of them are female figurines. The whole articulated female figure market is just now coming into popularity, and is offering an affordable alternative to the high-end semi-pornographic statues that have been the norm. As a fan of action figures in general, I appreciate new and interesting advances in figure technology.

And really, who doesn't love a pretty face?

That's not to say that CDX is going to become MOEDX, but If we find figures that interest us, or that are somehow related to the robot / sci-fi genre, we may cover them.

What say you?

------------------------------
CollectionDX Admin



Bettie's picture
Submitted by Bettie on 3 July, 2008 - 08:20.

I have to say the amusing part to me is that the only reason I found this site was, in fact, girly (well, and monster ...erhhm... ok, monster girly) toys. I have a bit of a predilection, you see.

So does that mean I need to vote yes?

Seriously, girly toys are fine - provided of course they don't walk that kiddie porn line. As an adult (and a girl), I sometimes like a naughtier toy. Then again, sometimes, I like a girl who just wants to blow crap up.

[Oh - when with they make my Tank Girl toy?! Or my Fran from FFXII?! Seriously.]

B.



JoshB's picture
Submitted by JoshB on 3 July, 2008 - 09:00.

I would go insane over a Tank Girl toy - what a great idea!

Welcome aboard.

------------------------------
CollectionDX Admin



EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Submitted by EVA_Unit_4A on 8 June, 2008 - 17:00.

I agree. I voted for a little spice in life because this site is about collecting Japanese toys and models. Yes, the majority of our reviews focus on technological marvels, but I'm sure a lithe female form once in a while to out little geek hut wouldn't be too bad once in a while.
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff



Mike's picture
Submitted by Mike on 8 June, 2008 - 17:28.

Nothing wrong with them, as long as it's a cool toy. I mean, even if it isn't, there's nothing wrong with covering it, because then people will know it's not a good figure. As much as I love shiny metallic violence, this couldn't hurt.



Berserk's picture
Submitted by Berserk on 8 June, 2008 - 19:11.

For variation, I think is okay. But I think mechas and vintage toys makes CDX rise above the competition.



Rob Braun's picture
Submitted by Rob Braun on 8 June, 2008 - 19:13.

I vote in defense, its another zany element of our "Awesome He-Man Giant Robots Club." Besides, they can't be any different from collecting Arcee(s) or the Chogo "Mazinger mecha Gals" even though there we can make "Check out the Warheads on that one" jokes all day long.

"Chicks dig giant robots."
Jamie, MEGAS XLR



GogDog's picture
Submitted by GogDog on 8 June, 2008 - 19:57.

I agree that variety is good. But it does seem that there are thousands of these girly figures out there, and they could easily flood out anything else. It just depends on what you want the focus of the site to be. Me personally, I'm here for my love of robots, and I think most people are, too. The occasional girly figure isn't bad once in a while.

Also, Josh, have you gotten my emails, or are you just ignoring me? If you are, just tell me. :)



JoshB's picture
Submitted by JoshB on 8 June, 2008 - 20:56.

I havent gotten any emails from you sorry. Have you sent them through the CDX system? Otherwise email me at josh@collectiondx.com

------------------------------
CollectionDX Admin



GogDog's picture
Submitted by GogDog on 9 June, 2008 - 01:48.

Yeah, I sent them through your contact page on your profile here. Do you host destroyallpodcastsdx.com as well? They had the same issue with me.



JoshB's picture
Submitted by JoshB on 9 June, 2008 - 11:56.

Yes, I host both - same mail server but the problem has been resolved.

------------------------------
CollectionDX Admin



GogDog's picture
Submitted by GogDog on 9 June, 2008 - 02:03.

Just sent an email.



apex3's picture
Submitted by apex3 on 8 June, 2008 - 20:36.

Collextion DX should post robots and stuff people collect, if we don't like...we can just unclick or not collect. Me personally, I don't like the girly figures (the mazinger girl robots with missle breast I find half hilarious in an embarassing way and half offensive), but to each their own.



JoshB's picture
Submitted by JoshB on 9 June, 2008 - 11:57.

Essentially CollectionDX is about what we collect. While the focus is mainly robots, we do often venture into other Genre such as monsters, star wars, superheroes and others...

------------------------------
CollectionDX Admin



Cyclone Blue's picture
Submitted by Cyclone Blue on 8 June, 2008 - 20:39.

Cyclone Blue says,

it's okay, just don't overdo it. We still wanna see lots and lotsa robots.

"NO GNU IS GOOD GNU LIKE GARY GNU!"



JoshB's picture
Submitted by JoshB on 9 June, 2008 - 11:58.

Don't worry, lots of robots on the way. Coming up this week is at least 3 chogokin and the new GNU figures from Yamato

------------------------------
CollectionDX Admin



saga_gx's picture
Submitted by saga_gx on 8 June, 2008 - 21:43.

Please no
NO GIRL FIGURINES
I love collection Dx cause it true to collectors and not the average otaku-fap-with-figurine site.
Seriously , from what I have seen , that tipe of figures are like an adiction , once you start, you can't stop.
Maybe some mecha related would be ok , but , at least for me, I'd hate to see reviews of the otaku type figurines
Reviews of Motoko Kusanagi (GITS) , Nono from diebuster, or other robot related gals may not be bad.



JoshB's picture
Submitted by JoshB on 9 June, 2008 - 11:59.

Yeah, those type of figure reviews I can see us doing. I'm a robot nerd at heart, and married, so only so many of those figures can be allowed in my collection before i start getting weird looks from the wife and kids.

------------------------------
CollectionDX Admin



The Big R's picture
Submitted by The Big R on 8 June, 2008 - 21:47.

I'm not a fan of the girly figures in general. I don't collect or read or watch any of those shows or books. They are just not entertaining to me at all, and a lot of the programs in that genre of anime are not very respectful of women at all.

That said, I just don't click on those articles, so it doesn't bother me that they are there. I check out the articles that interest me. Sometimes, there are parts of the site I personally don't like, or only check out once in a while like the podcasts, I also don't check out the videos ever (unless there's some electronic feature or something that can not be photographed or explained well.) but I would *hate* for any of those to go away, because that might disapoint some readers.

I'm more of a supporter of the "DX" part of the site- the bigger chogokin sets, jumbos, vintage diecast, vinyls, 1/6 figures, horror movies. the classic stuff. This place really has become a nice, easy to search database for collectors, and to me at least has had a consistantly high quality of writing for years- a brief history, details about the toy, intelligent well thought out impressions, clean pictures, a sense of humor but not childish or trying to be a comedian. I've often thought that CDX if it's articles were put into a book,

There are a lot of articles that I just don't read, and I'm here almost every day.

I really dig that the site has been branching out a bit, with the model kits, and non-robot anime show toys. I would love to see DVD reviews too of some type.

I hate to say "no, don't do this type of product review" without offering some type of suggestions of what to do reviews of:
Vintage diecast spaceships, playsets, and figures, from Popy or anyone else- these toys are overlooked all the time and the ones reviewed are cool.
more monster vinyl
much more imports (non-US) toys and vintage-
more bootlegs of any type, not just robots...

But as long as the writing stays smart, the pictures stay good, and the diecast keeps flowing, you can't lose.



JoshB's picture
Submitted by JoshB on 9 June, 2008 - 12:03.

You don't watch the videos? Man, we put so much work into those!

But anyway, yeah, we have lots of different things in the queue to cover. I haven't even scratched the surface of my vintage collection here on the site, so there will be plenty of that to come.

DVD reviews have always been a thought, but I think I would want to get someone to cover those on a dedicated basis.

------------------------------
CollectionDX Admin



eitlobsaboo's picture
Submitted by eitlobsaboo on 9 June, 2008 - 01:34.

I prefer the big robots over these hugely endowed ladies flooding pretty much every show lately, and thus arent a big fan of these panty shot figures.

As magnificently sculptured some of these figures are (Yamato Creators Labo Rei Ayanami anyone?) I dont think they belong here.

However, i dont mind the odd exception every now and then, like the new Revoltech Yotsuba or the MMS line or something like that.



SimonT's picture
Submitted by SimonT on 9 June, 2008 - 02:52.

I am not a huge fan of them but I do see Josh B point. I am intrigued by the new technology that is behind them, i.e figma and revoltech. Manufactures are going to produce products people want. I guess there is a big market out there for detail anime/manga figures. For example, there are a slew of Gundam female figures of all scale for sale.

I am not interested in fixed figures as well sculpted as they maybe. The whole loli things gets a little creepy.



Rob Braun's picture
Submitted by Rob Braun on 9 June, 2008 - 09:04.

Wow, a lot of commentary on the opposition, but I have to say that this is merely a friendly question of what added content will be here. I know I've been lax/behind/etc excuses about my role here with the Gunpla, so I know Josh and the crew have been working double time to fill in for missing content with extra content of some variety. We've seen a great deal of Universal Movie Monsters (classics!) and even some great entries on Bootlegs, now much of these are not the giant robots we all know and love, but these are just some of the things that makes some of our Collections so DX.

Rob, The Resident Gundam Guy!



megatroptimus's picture
Submitted by megatroptimus on 9 June, 2008 - 11:08.

If you're talking about scantily clad apparently underage or barely legal female figures, then no. It's just sick and retarded.



JoshB's picture
Submitted by JoshB on 9 June, 2008 - 11:55.

I agree with that. What i'm talking about is more of the female action figures - like pilots from EVA, Street fighter characters, etc. We do want to keep these reviews "clean" so to speak.

------------------------------
CollectionDX Admin



Atom's picture
Submitted by Atom on 9 June, 2008 - 12:25.

Pocco from Revoltech would be an example of appropriate to the site; too many more school students.... not so much. We will gauge accordingly. :)

___________________
CollectionDX Writer



duke togo's picture
Submitted by duke togo on 9 June, 2008 - 13:46.

I voted noooo for reasons I've made plain here and elsewhere. I've always thought CDX was more about robots and Japanese sci-fi, with everything those entail. The occasional Star Wars, movie monster, and GI Joe piece is fine since anyone in our collective age group grew up with that stuff and it's embedded in our minds. That's always been how I've perceived the site.

Figures of girls from connected shows, like Fraulein Eva stuff and the like are fair game. But stuff like the Pocco or the Figma stuff just feels like it should be on a different site, or at least a separate area of the site. The only connection it has is the technology and manufacturer.

Look at Danny Choo's site. He covers Gundam, GK, moe, and other robot stuff, but they're in their own categories. So if you aren't interested in kiddie porn figures, you don't have to wade through it to see the new Revoltech release.

Moe is a whole different animal. I know it's subjective and some feel it's harmless while others view it as borderline kiddie porn. I'm in the middle but more towards the latter with the somewhat hypocritical position of admitting to liking some moe stuff. It's a touchy subject that has wide streaks of gray.

The depictions of teenage or older girls is fine by me, but some of this stuff is just wrong. I don't like looking at half naked figures of a 12 year-old girl in a suggestive pose, partly because it's questionably legal, and second because it starts to make you think it's okay to like that sort of thing. It's like some form of peer-pressure on a national scale.

Japan seems to think it's all fair game, it's part of the mainstream culture, that's just crazy to me. It's like the ecchi otaku looking up skirts of figures joke went too far and now it's gotten out of control.



Sanjeev's picture
Submitted by Sanjeev on 9 June, 2008 - 17:05.

I gotta tell ya, I'm with duke on this one...wholeheartedly.

Those who know me well know that I'm a pretty liberal guy. The thing is, I firmly believe that there's definitely such a thing as being too liberal. In this particular case, I sincerely believe that pretty much any acceptance of "moe" is being way too liberal with this type of *off* (read: messed the hell up) objectification of young girls.

No, moe is NOT kiddie porn. However, if you do any sort of research on pedophiles, you will see the clear psychological parallels between pedophiles/child pornographers and this rising crop of lonely otaku. Again, they're clearly different segments of society...otaku does NOT equal pedophile. ...But how long is it going to take for some horrifying news story to break about some shut-in otaku who's found to have molested several children in his neighborhood? And how many more times will that same story be repeated before something positive in society actually gets done to think better about them and protect our children better?

I'm seeing parallels between this phenomenon and more and more common stories of young men who shoot up their schools in the US. I don't blame these people and I don't advocate hating on them, but we all need to think about these situations better.

Again, I'm not advocating otaku-bashing or anything like that. But, c'mon guys...there's a difference between appreciating a cool action figure of Motoko Kusanagi or Rei Ayanami (staple characters of established, popular sci-fi)...and non-character toys of "sexy", underage female characters [Well...I guess Pocco's from a video game or something...but really...how many CDX readers are into this game??? She's clearly not a character like Tifa from Final Fantasy. And it's pretty damn obvious that the figure/character's meant to titilate lonely nerds' frozen fascinations...as opposed to be a fun toy representing a well-loved character.]

...

Honestly, though, I think it boils down to this for me personally: regardless of how one views moe--harmless appreciation or borderline sickness--I simply don't want myself or my hobby to be in any way associated with it.

I don't want my girlfriend, or my mother, or little kids in my home to walk by my computer and see anime-boobs and upskirt toy shots on my screen while I'm trying to browse for friggin' robot toys, y'knowmsayin???

--
Sanjeev



Destroy All Podcasts DX's picture
Submitted by Destroy All Pod... on 9 June, 2008 - 18:50.

Isn't Rei from Evangelion fourteen?

-Jeremy



Mike's picture
Submitted by Mike on 9 June, 2008 - 19:01.

Technically, I'm pretty sure you could say Rei II and III are even younger.



Sanjeev's picture
Submitted by Sanjeev on 10 June, 2008 - 11:09.

That's true: Rei's fourteen...but there are legitimate figures of her that I think are wholly fine. Fourteen or not, she's a very complex main character from a highly sophisticated, acclaimed science fiction series...regardless of whether or not the character's objectified by otaku.

No offense to EVA, but it's garbage like this that detracts from the sanctity of this hobby! ;)

--
Sanjeev



GogDog's picture
Submitted by GogDog on 10 June, 2008 - 19:28.

Oh, man, I laughed hard at that one.



EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Submitted by EVA_Unit_4A on 10 June, 2008 - 21:28.

"Laughed hard at" what, exactly...? :-(
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff



GogDog's picture
Submitted by GogDog on 10 June, 2008 - 22:32.

Just the whole progression of that thread of the discussion. No offense meant.



EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Submitted by EVA_Unit_4A on 10 June, 2008 - 21:26.

Garbage? "Garbage", you say...??? great- now I do feel obligated to defend myself at that, sir!

I have never, ever purchased a female figure in my entire life for myself. (I sure don't plan to anytime soon either!) Being an Aspie means I lean more toward the technical (robots, ships, etc.) than I do the emotional or social (characters) of a story. And so, for me to stick my neck out and go out on a really fine limb and purchase not one, but two static-pose female figures was most out-of-character for moi. I had no interest in any other figure of Rei or Asuka (still don't) because they have been done to death in all manner of outfit.
In the case of the two I own, it was because the characters were approached from a completely unconventional direction that I felt compelled to get them. That was also the reason I covered them (well, mermaid Rei-chan, at least)- they were so out there that I thought they might be worth a look by CDXers. I certainly wasn't trying to pass them on (if I influenced you to get one, yippy), but I was trying to expose you to something different.
Now perhaps this may not have been the best venue for me to post [mermaid Rei-chan] in, but if I'd covered her for a site where figures are the norm, it would've been passed over as quickly as any other figure there.
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff



Destroy All Podcasts DX's picture
Submitted by Destroy All Pod... on 11 June, 2008 - 11:36.

I thought Shinji was the main character? But still, Eva itself totally sexualizes and even fetishizes clearly underaged girls so I'm not sure how bandaged, half-naked Rei is better than mermaid Rei.

-J



EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Submitted by EVA_Unit_4A on 11 June, 2008 - 14:50.

For anyone who hasn't seen the show, they may be surprised to learn after all this moe that a depressed and lonely fourteen year-old boy is indeed the star of the show. And I can't even remember the last time I've seen a figure of him made in the last few years. Needless to say, Shinji's wardrobe has never been elaborated with such frequency as Asuka and Rei. Ironically, perhaps only Kaworu who appeared in the last few episodes (for spoilers' sake, I won't go beyond that) may have a slight edge on our depressed hero in that category!
And here's another one- Misato Katsuragi, who is 29, is usually only seen in her regular black outfit with her 'officer's jacket'. She's a regular in the series, and yet how many figures to we see of her? Or perhaps her colleague/friend Dr. Ritsuko Akagi (30yrs)? Both are well over 18, and yet seen with as little frequency as Rei and Asuka who are both half their age!

As to my reasoning, here's how I see it: Which have we seen more often- Rei bandage in both her school and plug suit, or her as a mermaid?
Or, let me put this another way: how often do you see other characters not associated with "Evangelion" appearing as a mermaid when they never did in their respective series/movie/OVA?

It was such a strange move by Sega that it actually moved me to go after them. It wasn't moe that drove me to cover them. Now, I'm not saying that mermaid Asuka-chan and Rei-chan aren't a part of moe, but that they were certainly an interesting and out-there take on them. And they were also cheap for how they turned out.
If Sega had continued the Extra Mermaid Figure line with Misato and Ritsuko, I probably would have gotten them as well.
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff



Sanjeev's picture
Submitted by Sanjeev on 11 June, 2008 - 16:25.

Sorry for the awkward wording, J--I meant that Rei is one of the main characters...of a complex sci-fi show. Yes, Shinji is the main character. In fact, when it really comes down to it, ALL the other characters and events in the show serve as little more than "character" devices, if you will, for the purpose of developing his character.

Anyway...I do disagree with the statement that the show, itself, fetishizes underage girls. Yes, there's definitely an element of sexuality in the show, and yes, it's probably got a lot to do with Anno's own...issues. But watching the show, there's just so much involved in the deconstruction of Shinji's character, I just don't think it makes much sense to focus on the sexualization of the female characters. Yes, it's there, but it's just too minor an element of the total story being told.

Now...what the otaku have done within the "fandom", on the other hand...that's clearly sexualization/fetishization. Hence all these toys and whatnot.

And, EVA_Unit_4A, don't sweat it, bruh. Like I said, no offense to you--I don't happen to dig that figure...at all. Besides, I have no clue what an "Aspie" is, but I think it's pretty clear by reading your review of the figure, you're not really into that sort of thing, either!

--
Sanjeev



Destroy All Podcasts DX's picture
Submitted by Destroy All Pod... on 11 June, 2008 - 18:57.

While the show does not sexualize them to the level fans have as well as official Gainax products created after the fact, there's definitely an element of it in the show. For example, the clearly underaged girls are wearing those skintight plugsuits, and the bandaged Rei and schoolgirl outfits are clearly aimed at well-established otaku fetishes. There's a definite element of the submissive "sexy" character. Just like Macross Frontier panders to known Otaku fetishes, Eva does as well, though perhaps it is not trying to hit so MANY at once.

There's also the so-called masculine gaze as described by feminist film critic Laura Mulvey. Essentially, the positioning of women on screen, how they are filmed, and how they are edited by nature put women into passive positions where they are regarded as sex objects.

Examples are breaking a woman up into body parts. You don't show a shot of a woman's entire body and then a shot of her face. Instead, you show a shot of her calves, an shot of her thighs, a shot of her butt, a shot of her chest, then a shot of her face, or possibly the camera slowly sliding up over all of those parts. Men are typically not shot in this manner. They are usually shot in full body and close-up or full body, partial body, and close up. Hitchcock is of course the classic example.

But like I said before, posing can be just as important. For instance, you can pose women bent over a lot or whatever. Also the location of the camera can be important, such as the one shot I have seen over and over of the camera looking down Asuka's chest while she is wrapped in a towel.

While Eva does not necessarily say, "Hey, having sex with underaged girls is great!" it does sexualize the underaged girls that appear in it, far more so than older characters like Misato, as others have already mentioned.

And need I mention the scene with Shinji and Asuka's comatose body? I'm hard pressed to come up with a better example of the sexualized passive woman COMBINED with the moe fascination for injured girls who "need" the (imaginary) protection of the moe fan.

This is largely a matter of subtext, as Shinji is the main character, but it's still very much a part of Evangelion and to dismiss it is disingenuous.

Here's some stuff on the male gaze if you want more detail: http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/gaze/gaze09.html

Also: http://www.anime-source.com/banzai/contests/scavenger08/04.jpg Innocent?

-Jeremy



EVA_Unit_4A's picture
Submitted by EVA_Unit_4A on 11 June, 2008 - 21:57.

I can't disagree with a single word you just typed, Sanjeev. You certainly said it better than I could.


OT...

"Aspie" is a shortened (some say derogative) term for Asperger's Syndrome, a life-long form of high-functioning autism. In short, Asperger's is considered "high-functioning" because I can communicate normally like everyone else instead of uncontrollably slurring and waving my hands around all the time. However, the big downside is that I am similarly plagued with problems in social & emotional skills/communication that everyone else obtains naturally during childhood; these have to be actually taught to me. (Why do you think I've never had a girlfriend before? Too geeky? Perhaps, that's certainly a part of it. But consider that I also haven't had any "friends" in the real world for +16 years now.)
I've mentioned this a few times here before; certainly it appears on my profile page.
------------------------------
CollectionDX Staff



Juice's picture
Submitted by Juice on 9 June, 2008 - 16:48.

Hi Guys,
I'm totally addicted to this site and voted "yes" on the subject at hand, and taking that much responsibility seemed like a good excuse to finally register my membership. This is a great thread that is probably long in the making. As a perennial lurker, I would say that the girly figure aspect of collecting Japanese toys is legit, if not a little awkward. Along with super robots and kaiju, I collect "Good Girl Art" (anime, vintage, and low brow,) so I'm able to see the crossover appeal. If someone with a genuine interest in these 3-dimensional pin-ups would like to submit the typical well-crafted review, I will read it. I understand the moe argument although I myself haven't seen anything on this site that I've been uncomfortable with, and I don't see that pattern if exists at this time. In terms of high-minded coolness, if it's not G-Taste, WINchan, or more Bome as advertised in Previews, it's probably something of note and would be appreciated by more than just myself. We have a Yoko Frauline Revoltech coming up after all, which would be a shame not to see here considering the hype surrounding that line. But hey, that's just my two cents, and I can't complain if it's worth less than that. You guys can stretch this site out however you want or not, it will remain awesome.
Best,
Juice



NekroDave's picture
Submitted by NekroDave on 9 June, 2008 - 17:54.


"This must be settled the way nature intended....with a vicious, bloody fight!"
Onyx Blackman
Principal, Flatpoint High



xiombarg's picture
Submitted by xiombarg on 9 June, 2008 - 19:06.

If it's a cool figure, ok, but a huge majority of these girl figures are posed with their various cracks to be examined directly. I mean, these aren't exactly made for their great artistic value. It's T&A straight up. Not enough toy/hobby and too close to porn for me.



Typhus's picture
Submitted by Typhus on 9 June, 2008 - 20:36.

With some caveats.

Non T&A figures that are connected to various normal lines covered here would be fine from time to time. (Example. A normal outfit Super Robot Taisen character is cool. Something like that Kushua figure which is basically her and a VERY small towel? DECIDEDLY UNCOOL.)

If it seems dedicated to the creepy moe or other such obsessives, I would rather it stay far, FAR away. Anime has a bad enough reputation because of that malarkey as it is. CollectionDX should stand above such horrible things.



The Mazinger Z's picture
Submitted by The Mazinger Z on 10 June, 2008 - 20:58.

Start with the Chichinoe Plus and continue all the way to the Queens Blade and Witchblade ones!!!

}D



Mike's picture
Submitted by Mike on 10 June, 2008 - 21:28.

Well I can't argue with a suddenly sentient creation of Uncle Go.



xiombarg's picture
Submitted by xiombarg on 12 June, 2008 - 11:01.

So how about reviews of BOY figures?!! With sexy poses bending over where you can take their clothes off and examine their buttcracks and penial anatomy. The younger the better of course.. It's great that our hobby makes this kind of stuff so we can mix our toy fantasies with sexual lust!

Just to put some perspective on all of this.



gunplaman's picture
Submitted by gunplaman on 12 June, 2008 - 11:28.

I vote for yes for only ones that can move, something you can play with,
such as figma, frauelain(w/e the spelling is).
and I want more busou shinki plz.

no for the just stationary figures.



MisterK's picture
Submitted by MisterK on 17 June, 2008 - 12:09.

... than stuck on a plastic woman !

(said & done ;)



zolarzyztem's picture
Submitted by zolarzyztem on 18 June, 2008 - 07:21.

I voted nooooo, simply because there are lots of other sites out there that cover that kind of stuff. Plus there's just too many of them, only case where it would be okay is if the figure was from a scifi/robot show.
I come here to rub myself against robots' legs....

I vote more kaiju ! Realxhead/marmit/m1 stuff, you know.